From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 14 5:21:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.gfit.net (ns.gfit.net [209.41.124.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A3137B60E for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 05:21:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@embt.com) Received: from PARANOR (timembt.iinc.com [206.67.169.229]) by mercury.gfit.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA19331 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 07:31:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@embt.com) Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.20000314082040.01381840@mail.embt.com> X-Sender: tembt@mail.embt.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:20:40 -0500 To: current@FreeBSD.ORG From: Tom Embt Subject: Re: 4.0R ? In-Reply-To: <20000313190546.D80937@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> References: <38CD35C6.18891643@acm.org> <3.0.5.32.20000313130054.0105d6d0@marble.sentex.ca> <38CD35C6.18891643@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 19:05 03/13/2000 +0000, Ben Smithurst wrote: >Jim Bloom wrote: > >> The tag was laid down earlier today. Here is what my current kernel >> claims to be at the moment: > >I saw the RELENG_4 tag in my cvsup log, but I don't think that's the >same as the 4.0 release tag is it? That would be RELENG_4_0_0_RELEASE >surely. > I believe RELENG_4 would refer to the 4.x-STABLE branch (??maybe??), since it is different from 5.0-CURRENT but still not ready for it's first release. I'm no authority on the subject, though. Tom Embt tom@embt.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message