From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 23 16:32:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529251065686 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:32:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tnelson@fudnet.net) Received: from zmail.fudnet.net (97-112-99-210.dlth.qwest.net [97.112.99.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1484F8FC17 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tnelson@fudnet.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zmail.fudnet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D5B10AC1D5; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:13:27 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.916 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.916 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[AWL=-0.417, BAYES_00=-2.599, RDNS_NONE=0.1] Received: from zmail.fudnet.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmail.fudnet.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UUrNUIet5uWK; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:13:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [172.16.23.49] (unknown [208.79.71.71]) by zmail.fudnet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EF310AC1D4; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:13:26 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <485FCBD1.8020807@fudnet.net> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:14:09 -0500 From: Tim Nelson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kage References: <18034453.post@talk.nabble.com> <20080622122635.GA9784@alchemy.franken.de> <18072527.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <18072527.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gem0 frame error X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:32:14 -0000 Kage wrote: > > Marius Strobl wrote: > >> With what version of FreeBSD is this? >> >> Marius >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > > > I feel like punching myself. One of the first things you always learn about > systems is to "check the cables". Well, I thought back to the path this > system was connected through and then about the statement that 10BT > half-duplex is uncommon, which struck me again when it was mentioned. So I > checked, and it hit me so hard I slapped my forehead - the test systems I > have here run through an old superstack II....which is limited to 10BT. > Removing this from that switch and then wiring it directly into the good > switch fixed the problem completely. > > At least I can say I fixed something today. Thanks for the help! > > (It is 7.0-release, by the way) > Regardless... shouldn't the driver properly deal with being plugged into a 10BT Half-Duplex environment?