From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 23 09:08:52 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA24450 for current-outgoing; Thu, 23 May 1996 09:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA24443 for ; Thu, 23 May 1996 09:08:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0uMcuz-0003wvC; Thu, 23 May 96 09:07 PDT Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id CAA01848; Thu, 23 May 1996 02:01:34 GMT To: Wolfram Schneider cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CTM & cvs update In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 May 1996 13:11:55 +0200." <199605231111.NAA01007@campa.panke.de> Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 02:01:31 +0000 Message-ID: <1846.832816891@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > A full cvs update takes me 1952.43 real 92.37 user 190.84 sys > This is slow. Can I use the output from ctm_rmail for a faster > update? E.g.: > > $ ctm_rmail [options] > ctm_output_log_file 2>&1 > $ cvs update `egrep ' > .. (src|ports)/' | > awk '{print $NF}' | sed 's/,v$//'` If you make an option to ctm_rmail to do it, I'll review and approve even if you write it in COBOL :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.