Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:37:43 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Cc: freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvsup-mirror rewrite Message-ID: <20041211203743.GA11341@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20041211123553.GM79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20041207231019.GL79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <XFMail.20041207193827.jdp@polstra.com> <20041208082000.GP79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <41B730B5.5040100@jonny.eng.br> <20041208224605.GU79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <41B860DA.5080309@jonny.eng.br> <20041211123553.GM79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 01:35:53PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 12:27:38PM -0200, Jo?o Carlos Mendes Lu?s wrote:
> >
> > [...]
>
> Well, I won't be deeply convinced that using ${PREFIX}/${PORTNAME} as
> installation target it the cleanest thing to do while the core team
> won't direct us to do so. In fact, I think your arguments are not so
> bad and I'm going to adopt your point of view for a first try in the
> code rewrite (anyway changing installation location is not so hard),
> even if it's totally breaking hier(7) IMHO.
>
> But for now, I'm quite harassed that both hierarchies are used in the
> same time ; I think this is going to be a mess if port maintainers
> are able either to spread the port files accross the standard hierarchy
> (hier(7)) or to simply put them all in ${PREFIX}/${PORTNAME} depending
> on their own policy without further control.
See section 17.10 of the porter's handbook.
Kris
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFBu1qWWry0BWjoQKURAq//AKCymGY2ye5NBSwBerchbesuE2HcRQCfTX/d
Ati+ezrTy40JAOnvXyifE1c=
=LUxk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041211203743.GA11341>