From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 20:30:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DFE16A4CE; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 20:30:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AFB43D31; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 20:30:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3EDE951432; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:37:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:37:43 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jeremie Le Hen Message-ID: <20041211203743.GA11341@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041207231019.GL79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20041208082000.GP79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <41B730B5.5040100@jonny.eng.br> <20041208224605.GU79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <41B860DA.5080309@jonny.eng.br> <20041211123553.GM79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041211123553.GM79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: jdp@FreeBSD.org cc: mux@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvsup-mirror rewrite X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 20:30:49 -0000 --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 01:35:53PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 12:27:38PM -0200, Jo?o Carlos Mendes Lu?s wrote: > >=20 > > [...] >=20 > Well, I won't be deeply convinced that using ${PREFIX}/${PORTNAME} as > installation target it the cleanest thing to do while the core team > won't direct us to do so. In fact, I think your arguments are not so > bad and I'm going to adopt your point of view for a first try in the > code rewrite (anyway changing installation location is not so hard), > even if it's totally breaking hier(7) IMHO. >=20 > But for now, I'm quite harassed that both hierarchies are used in the > same time ; I think this is going to be a mess if port maintainers > are able either to spread the port files accross the standard hierarchy > (hier(7)) or to simply put them all in ${PREFIX}/${PORTNAME} depending > on their own policy without further control. See section 17.10 of the porter's handbook. Kris --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBu1qWWry0BWjoQKURAq//AKCymGY2ye5NBSwBerchbesuE2HcRQCfTX/d Ati+ezrTy40JAOnvXyifE1c= =LUxk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj--