From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Thu Aug 4 15:27:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB4BBAF275 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 15:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AC4B1B00 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 15:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u74FRvj6084059 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 15:27:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211579] Remove socket support in cat(1) Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 15:27:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-BETA3 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: venture37@geeklan.co.uk X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 15:27:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211579 --- Comment #4 from Sevan Janiyan --- (In reply to Maxim Konovalov from comment #3) Apologies, it's in the addition to cat.1 introduced in r83482, not in the commit message itself. > There is a non-zero probability that people are using this particular fea= ture in their scripts and removing it will break backward compatibility wit= h no particular reason. I would argue that seeing as a major branch is about it be cut, now would be the time to evaluate such a change, it would be quite some time before it m= ade it into a major release and would fish out some active participants who are users of the feature. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=