From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan  5 15:32:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B6C3316A4CE; Mon,  5 Jan 2004 15:32:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5B62843D31; Mon,  5 Jan 2004 15:32:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de
	[IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7])	(authenticated bits=0)
	i05NVwN1071948
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK);
	Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:31:59 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de
	[IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12])
	by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i05NVeMO027439
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:31:41 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i05NVeBE039755;
	Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:31:40 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de)
Received: (from ticso@localhost)
	by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i05NVdZg039754;
	Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:31:39 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ticso)
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:31:39 +0100
From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-ID: <20040105233138.GR17023@cicely12.cicely.de>
References: <20040102224015.GI17023@cicely12.cicely.de>
	<XFMail.20040105172940.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
	<20040105231533.GQ17023@cicely12.cicely.de>
	<20040105.162427.30502300.imp@bsdimp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040105.162427.30502300.imp@bsdimp.com>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
	version=2.61
X-Spam-Report: 
	* -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	*      [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	cicely5.cicely.de
cc: ticso@cicely12.cicely.de
cc: ticso@cicely.de
cc: jhb@FreeBSD.org
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Still IRQ routing problems with bridged devices.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 23:32:12 -0000

On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 04:24:27PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20040105231533.GQ17023@cicely12.cicely.de>
>             Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> writes:
> : The point is that it shouldn't take an IRQ for PCI which is configured
> : for an ISA device in device.hints.
> 
> We don't do that.

We do!

/boot/device.hints:
hint.sio.0.irq="4"

pci_cfgintr_virgin: using routable interrupt 4
pci_cfgintr: 0:4 INTD routed to irq 4

-- 
B.Walter                   BWCT                http://www.bwct.de
ticso@bwct.de                                  info@bwct.de