From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Sep 7 10: 0: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396D737B42C for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 10:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id KAA67638; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 10:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 10:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200009071700.KAA67638@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Will Andrews Subject: Re: bin/21093: New option for restore (patch) Reply-To: Will Andrews Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/21093; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews To: Matthew Jacob , Stefan Moeding Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/21093: New option for restore (patch) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 11:51:02 -0500 On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:30:03AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > IMO, this is not sufficient enough reason to add the feature. I agree with Matt. If X feature does not require complex scripts, it's probably not going to be added to Y program (see df -c, etc.). -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+ a--- C++ UB++++$ P+ L- E--- W+ N-- !o ?K w--- O- M+ V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+ G++ e>++++ h! r- y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message