Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:45:33 -0800 From: Jason Helfman <jgh@FreeBSD.org> To: sbruno@freebsd.org Cc: "hackers@freebsd.org" <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: mfid, raid monitoring daemon Message-ID: <CAMuy=%2Bjf0V0uusTn%2B_H%2B5DiXD2U4M2xAuNk9HNPoMSV-SMbgUA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1331230126.3075.13.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> References: <1331230126.3075.13.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > I'm trying to decide if I should cram "mfid" for mfi(4) controllers into > the src tree or if we should package it up into a ports package. I > suspect that either one is acceptible, but it seems to make more sense > to put it into the src tree since mfiutil is also there. > > Comments? > > Sean > > ref: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/user/sbruno/mfid/ > I agree with placing it into the tree. Mfiutil is a great utility, but having a monitoring daemon in the tree would be a great addition. -jgh
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMuy=%2Bjf0V0uusTn%2B_H%2B5DiXD2U4M2xAuNk9HNPoMSV-SMbgUA>