From owner-freebsd-office@freebsd.org Thu Jul 19 19:30:08 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-office@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698461046C14 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012BF76392 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B512A1046C13; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: office@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A207C1046C12 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3967A7638E for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EE641B467 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w6JJU6xl091445 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:30:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w6JJU64N091444 for office@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:30:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 229888] devel/boost-libs: Fix undefined behavior in boost::filesystem::copy Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:30:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:30:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D229888 Jan Beich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|maintainer-feedback? | --- Comment #1 from Jan Beich --- The provided example doesn't crash. Tested on 11.2 i386/amd64 with boost-libs-1.68.0 (beta1) built by clang 6.0.0 and boost-libs-1.67.0_2 buil= t on package cluster by clang 4.0.0. (In reply to Michael Gmelin from comment #0) > The same code worked on 10.3 with clang 3.9 (at least on an older ports t= ree), FreeBSD 10.* has Clang 3.4.1 in base while USES=3Dcompiler:c++14-lang has n= ever used devel/llvm39 by default. > that's why this is a ticking time bomb for people upgrading to 11.2. Was the issue exposed by -std=3Dgnu++14 being default since Clang 6 or can = you reproduce by building the consumer with -std=3Dgnu++98? Otherwise, I don't understand why the issue would hit 10.3 -> 11.2 users but not 11.1 -> 11.2. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=