From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 19 12:53:23 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA00445 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 12:53:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA00440 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 12:53:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id MAA07179 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 12:53:16 -0800 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id VAA18108; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 21:50:52 +0100 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id VAA02647; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 21:50:52 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.7.4/8.6.9) id VAA03815; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 21:44:24 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199603192044.VAA03815@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: Max User Proc killing httpd? To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 21:44:24 +0100 (MET) Cc: david@polaris.canweb.ca Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199603191358.HAA27150@brasil.moneng.mei.com> from "Joe Greco" at Mar 19, 96 07:58:49 am X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Joe Greco wrote: > > Anyone know how to up this limit? > > use "limit" or "unlimit" from the shell? :-) or "ulimit" for Bourne-type shells (including FreeBSD's /bin/sh later than 2.1R). Btw., what's the opinion about pulling the "ulimit" implementation for /bin/sh into -stable? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)