From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jul 23 17:20:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA02081 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 23 Jul 1998 17:20:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA02076 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 1998 17:20:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id RAA25152; Thu, 23 Jul 1998 17:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 17:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199807240020.RAA25152@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Subject: Re: ports/7382: Pine4 does not co-exist with older installed version of pine. Reply-To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/7382; it has been noted by GNATS. From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) To: ady@freebsd.ady.ro Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/7382: Pine4 does not co-exist with older installed version of pine. Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 17:11:16 -0700 (PDT) * and > branches will come too soon). For the moment I'll work with * libpico.so.2.0 -- we can always later go for to the libpicoX.so.x.y * scheme if needed. Does that allow users who already have pine4 installed on their system to compile pine3? Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message