From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 19 02:01:47 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA14585 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 02:01:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from obiwan.aceonline.com.au (obiwan.aceonline.com.au [203.103.90.67]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA14576 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 02:01:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (adrian@localhost) by obiwan.aceonline.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA01949; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 17:58:43 +0800 (WST) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 17:58:42 +0800 (WST) From: Adrian Chadd To: Josef Karthauser cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Mike Pritchard , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re : "screen " (was Re: dup3() - I've thought it over and decided...) In-Reply-To: <19970319093358.36887@pavilion.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The package 'screen' allows a similar thing. It manages virtual > shells on a terminal and allows you to detach the whole lot in one > go, and then reattach from anywhere. I used to use it at University > when terminals were hard to hold on to all day (due to student demand). > Useful for that FTP that's going to take all day. :) > Thats the exact reason why I hate giving screen access to our users :) Remember how much net traffic COSTS in Australia (I'm not going to scare you US people..) but now when people logout it kills all their processes, my excuse is that it doesn't leave the occasional ncftp or irc in a loop chewing up CPU time :) (I also like it cause it lets me "lock" my screens when I walk away from terminals for a few minutes). Adrian.