From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 12 19:20:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DDCBFC for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jessica.lyn@finglee.net) Received: from mx57.dns.com.cn (mx57.dns.com.cn [220.181.130.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58F9F8FC08 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97166 invoked by uid 88); 12 Oct 2012 19:13:47 -0000 X-DNS-MID: mx57.dns.com.cn/1350069227/129/754129 X-DNS-FLAG: ------ Received: from unknown (HELO www-5c0a134c133) (218.66.195.250) by mx57.dns.com.cn with SMTP; 12 Oct 2012 19:13:47 -0000 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 03:13:43 +0800 (CST) From: jessica To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <29908535.25050.1350069223278.JavaMail.SYSTEM@www-5c0a134c133> Subject: Re:Secrete Of Finglee Polishing Pad MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-mailer: javamail@entsoft Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:20:30 -0000 SGksd2UgYXJlIHByb2Zlc3Npb25hbCBtYWtlciBmb3IgdGhpcy4NCg0KUHJvZmVzc2lvbmFsIFBh ZCBGb3IgY29uY3JldGUuDQpXYXRlciBvciBEcnkgVXNlLg0KU2VnbWVudCBIZWlnaHQ6IDVtbS4N ClNoYXJwZXIgYW5kIGxvbmdlciBsaWZlc3Bhbi4NCkhpZ2ggZWZmZWN0aXZlIGNvc3QgcGVyZm9y bWFuY2UuDQoNCldlbGNvbWUgaW5xdXJ5IQ0KUGxzIHRlbGwgbWUgaWYgZGlzdHVyYiB5b3UseW91 ciBhZGRyZXNzIHdpbGwgYmUgZGVsZXRlZCBmcm9tIG15IGNvbnRhY3QgbGlzdC4NClRoYW5rIHlv dSENCg0KSG9wZSB0byBoZWFyIGZyb20geW91IHNvb24uDQpSZWdhcmRzDQpKZXNzaWNh From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 12 21:21:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B249674; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:21:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21948FC18; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id bi1so3451409pad.13 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:21:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Dpo5UQdIDPyQzC0c2vtwWqhA7LnG5MJBKGsvPkdEt1k=; b=AFs9Fbtj2Q8HmwlttuziOrYYeV9b0SjPX3ySSV70oK55edYW3qdZkL0W7pWwyy+1eT y1gfq4VFNgFZ6VyiCWLClKPhxuzoH7dW3nKHVQuS+MtTbGGXrPQcb6wI8y4eWXK7kMk7 mxZKfQiC8fCZdsb0Y9nc/wqECb7T55VSHV53UNObckE6a7Zl3nj4Qtav9qVv8aHZWuXx PRFk9a44R+MBs8jtuJPN7Tc3TL7LjGCS5NkNV7vsTaK+IBw5z7ho/rivKnMHR/3GuTFk X8gk5uZXtBi6qVBp35ER0fQQjbjbG0WvbwIigkDyQIbsBBay0R0zTqPFCHVf86BtBArF 1+pQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.77.70 with SMTP id q6mr14430235paw.24.1350076880417; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:21:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.146.233 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:21:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <507832E3.1050801@quip.cz> References: <507832E3.1050801@quip.cz> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 17:21:20 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9T_v7aoM8UOksoyicL3iaNdkbOY Message-ID: Subject: Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 From: Adrian Chadd To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" , freebsd-current , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:21:21 -0000 On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about config, > but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. And they > are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2. Hey cool! And FreeBSD-9.1 is on there and doing worse than Linux and Dragonfly BSD. I wonder why that is. Lemme cross post this a little to see what people think. > http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2012-October/017536.html > > Graphs are available as PDF attachments > > http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0002.pdf > > http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0003.pdf Adrian