From owner-freebsd-isp Wed May 9 8:44:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from digitaldaemon.com (digitaldaemon.com [63.105.9.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73F1737B422 for ; Wed, 9 May 2001 08:44:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jan@digitaldaemon.com) Received: (qmail 84262 invoked from network); 9 May 2001 15:42:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitaldaemon.com) (192.168.0.73) by digitaldaemon.com with SMTP; 9 May 2001 15:42:50 -0000 Message-ID: <3AF96569.2040809@digitaldaemon.com> Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 11:42:33 -0400 From: Jan Knepper User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Dills Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Two net blocks on one interface. References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000604050908020400060909" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --------------000604050908020400060909 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit What I try to do is extend the number of available IP addresses so I can host more services. I recently received the second net block. The first netblock is setup in /etc/rc.conf like: ifconfig_xl0="inet 163.105.9.34 netmask 0xFFFFFFE0" ifconfig_xl0_alias0="inet 163.105.9.35 netmask 255.255.255.255" ifconfig_xl0_alias1="inet 163.105.9.36 netmask 255.255.255.255" ifconfig_xl0_alias2="inet 163.105.9.37 netmask 255.255.255.255" ... than the second one follows: ifconfig_xl0_alias28="inet 165.204.18.130 netmask 0xFFFFFF80" ifconfig_xl0_alias29="inet 165.204.18.131 netmask 255.255.255.255" ifconfig_xl0_alias30="inet 165.204.18.132 netmask 255.255.255.255" ifconfig_xl0_alias31="inet 165.204.18.133 netmask 255.255.255.255" ifconfig_xl0_alias32="inet 165.204.18.134 netmask 255.255.255.255" ifconfig_xl0_alias33="inet 165.204.18.135 netmask 255.255.255.255" ifconfig_xl0_alias34="inet 165.204.18.136 netmask 255.255.255.255" ifconfig_xl0_alias35="inet 165.204.18.137 netmask 255.255.255.255" I hooked up an other computer to the hub that connects the router to the xl0 interface and gave that 165.204.18.171/25 But I seem to be unable to ping or traceroute from one machine to an other using the second net block. Jan Andy Dills wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2001, Jan Knepper wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've come to the great (may be not so) situation where I have two >> netblocks on one interface. >> Something like: >> 163.105.9.32/27 >> and >> 165.204.18.128/25 >> >> The first of the two has worked just fine for a long time. >> >> The network of the second net block seems to be problematic though. >> The IP's are visible on the machine itself, but there does not seem to >> be any traffic within the second net block. >> >> Any ideas? > > > Could you qualify that a little more? I'm not sure what you mean "there > does not seem to be any traffic". > > Are you trying to route between the two? > > Andy > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Andy Dills 301-682-9972 > Xecunet, LLC www.xecu.net > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Dialup * Webhosting * E-Commerce * High-Speed Access > > > > --------------000604050908020400060909 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit What I try to do is extend the number of available IP addresses so I can host more services.
I recently received the second net block.

The first netblock is setup in /etc/rc.conf like:
ifconfig_xl0="inet 163.105.9.34 netmask 0xFFFFFFE0"
ifconfig_xl0_alias0="inet 163.105.9.35 netmask 255.255.255.255"
ifconfig_xl0_alias1="inet 163.105.9.36 netmask 255.255.255.255"
ifconfig_xl0_alias2="inet 163.105.9.37 netmask 255.255.255.255"

... than the second one follows:

ifconfig_xl0_alias28="inet 165.204.18.130 netmask 0xFFFFFF80"
ifconfig_xl0_alias29="inet 165.204.18.131 netmask 255.255.255.255"
ifconfig_xl0_alias30="inet 165.204.18.132 netmask 255.255.255.255"
ifconfig_xl0_alias31="inet 165.204.18.133 netmask 255.255.255.255"
ifconfig_xl0_alias32="inet 165.204.18.134 netmask 255.255.255.255"
ifconfig_xl0_alias33="inet 165.204.18.135 netmask 255.255.255.255"
ifconfig_xl0_alias34="inet 165.204.18.136 netmask 255.255.255.255"
ifconfig_xl0_alias35="inet 165.204.18.137 netmask 255.255.255.255"

I hooked up an other computer to the hub that connects the router to the xl0 interface and gave that
165.204.18.171/25

But I seem to be unable to ping or traceroute from one machine to an other using the second net block.

Jan



Andy Dills wrote:
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Jan Knepper wrote:

Hi,

I've come to the great (may be not so) situation where I have two
netblocks on one interface.
Something like:
163.105.9.32/27
and
165.204.18.128/25

The first of the two has worked just fine for a long time.

The network of the second net block seems to be problematic though.
The IP's are visible on the machine itself, but there does not seem to
be any traffic within the second net block.

Any ideas?

Could you qualify that a little more? I'm not sure what you mean "there
does not seem to be any traffic".

Are you trying to route between the two?

Andy

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Andy Dills                              301-682-9972
Xecunet, LLC                            www.xecu.net
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dialup * Webhosting * E-Commerce * High-Speed Access





--------------000604050908020400060909-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message