From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 30 07:04:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A466106564A; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E62A8FC0A; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id KAA03219; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:04:20 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1SOkei-000Ift-3j; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:04:20 +0300 Message-ID: <4F9E3971.7090405@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:04:17 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120425 Thunderbird/12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marius Strobl References: <4F8999D2.1080902@FreeBSD.org> <20120422212102.GA66855@alchemy.franken.de> <4F9A6180.8090500@FreeBSD.org> <20120429164623.GG68446@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <20120429164623.GG68446@alchemy.franken.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [review request] zfsboot/zfsloader: support accessing filesystems within a pool X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:04:31 -0000 on 29/04/2012 19:46 Marius Strobl said the following: > Given that you certainly have a well better knowledge of ZFS, it > would be great if we could do it the other way around, i.e. commit > the sparc64 support first and then your patch after adapting > whatever you have in mind with things becoming different. In other > words, I'm basically ready to commit the following patch. As for > zfs_dev_init() this just wraps it in #if defined(__amd64__) || > defined(__i386__) in zfs.c for now. > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/boot_zfs_sparc64.diff OK, let's do it this way. -- Andriy Gapon