From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 12 04:58:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16B02904 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D016A7F9 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by padfa1 with SMTP id fa1so17359286pad.3 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:58:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ycombinator.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=g7aKifHXf+qbeWIYJu+FqwICh1mHsMCleKVIXjfQhD8=; b=F5aZ490RAU66FC7GCGDr/vzewUHHgK+QMUwSqtr5hVQtf/2nWlKQmAmvD+sN3sZv8r ZLJZAfIGicztx+U4mOLkoFD7dj9qzZZZxTIoA7Depf9srQMba14nDsYLtmfmRvUvk8Df Wsq9Qbs7OoqdjPPboCK2hLXonMgpdxDoROGP4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=g7aKifHXf+qbeWIYJu+FqwICh1mHsMCleKVIXjfQhD8=; b=m1X05gQ8DLQYZanfWdhObCauHJMG+FSfZ0sEbCBlplBCexmZ5RNHWoUxRact3uV9aD SKJNuhM7GgahGlJQyk/76Tq8TkakMspVBKEX+9SgEAAKlYNc2cln+kLq+f1Bb52D7wwN sbqPZs1PtRLvPIji3FzNXUBCydBnZljHpjCOHyksnj0UBM0tIvMxN/QjS/wPonk+syAO ieogWNWE1H1bJhUEFsctWabpJ5PXKxqmCqf3A2BKY5TkDRRr7j5AN1asdOpThHDYYRB6 KlqNdOCG/Gh5EtgP/no86/tg6AuNty4c0PWu22HveRcklVm6B7TCVCp3LabPQyKxNVCo Wprw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlcqcKhQd0Pk4mkMUUMtRX9V6xITaQaXslsxEFhldWR2Yal79E6ZZhibyKpE94BXHob4/pu MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.133.130 with SMTP id pc2mr84035170pdb.99.1426136306820; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.36.230 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:58:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <54FAD0B2.8060601@multiplay.co.uk> <54FAD47B.7090007@sorbs.net> <54FADEBF.2060905@multiplay.co.uk> <54FAE018.8080509@sorbs.net> <54FAE513.3030107@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:58:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ZFS Deadlock? From: Nick Sivo To: freebsd-fs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:58:28 -0000 We've got Racket running on 10.1 and are planning to switch over tonight. I'll come back with new stack traces and logs if we encounter similar problems. Thanks! -Nick On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Nick Sivo wrote: > Unfortunately in our case we can't easily upgrade to 10 or 10.1 > because Racket (6.1.1) on them isn't stable and core dumps. Fixing > Racket trunk on FreeBSD 10+ was not the next step I expected, > especially since 9.3 is still considered "supported" for nearly two > more years. > > Not what I wanted to hear, but good to know regardless. Thanks! > > -Nick > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Steven Hartland wrote: >> >> >> On 07/03/2015 11:25, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >>> >>> Steven Hartland wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 07/03/2015 10:35, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Steven Hartland wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> There are lots of fixes for ZFS issues in 10 so I'd recommend updated >>>>>> to 10.1-RELEASE to see if you issue is already resolved there. >>>>>> >>>>> Question is will the fixes be applied to 9.4? Will there be a 9.4? >>>>> >>>> Unlikely I now any changes I've been doing I've only been MFC'ing to >>>> 10 not 9 or 8. >>> >>> I wouldn't expect 8 being that it's already at 8.4 therefore no more >>> releases just patches... but are we not getting a 9.4? Should not the >>> known issues that have been addresses have their fixes integrated? >>> >> I couldn't comment on if there will be a 9.4, even if there is I wouldn't >> expect all the fixes that are in 10 to be present if I'm honest, the team >> only has so much time so prioritising the latest releases is just something >> that's going to have to happen. >> >> We're already had 10 and now 10.1 I'd say its time to upgrade ;-) >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"