From owner-freebsd-fs Wed Oct 31 0:57: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net (harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C01137B406 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:57:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from dialup-209.247.138.195.dial1.sanjose1.level3.net ([209.247.138.195] helo=mindspring.com) by harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 15yrB6-0003Ns-00; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:56:53 -0800 Message-ID: <3BDFBD07.85204EF3@mindspring.com> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:57:43 -0800 From: Terry Lambert Reply-To: tlambert2@mindspring.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer Cc: Bruce Evans , Alexander Leidinger , fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: physical block no -> name of file (FFS)? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Julian Elischer wrote: > > Bruce, they already KNOW the bad block address. > they want to find what file it is in... That was my take on it, too... My caveat is that they might have seen the console message about the bad block during the free of the blocks it had references to, rather than the free of the bad block itself. That would put it outside a file. You kind of need to be able to ask the question "what file is this bad block in, or is it even in a file at all, any more?". This is harder than the orignal question, but is a likely corner case. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message