From owner-freebsd-commit  Sat Sep 23 04:45:13 1995
Return-Path: owner-commit
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id EAA00539
          for freebsd-commit-outgoing; Sat, 23 Sep 1995 04:45:13 -0700
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id EAA00527
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Sat, 23 Sep 1995 04:45:09 -0700
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id EAA00517
          for cvs-games-outgoing; Sat, 23 Sep 1995 04:45:06 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA00503
          ; Sat, 23 Sep 1995 04:44:57 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id EAA03444; Sat, 23 Sep 1995 04:43:39 -0700
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1995 04:43:39 -0700
Message-Id: <199509231143.EAA03444@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: mark@grondar.za
CC: CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-games@freefall.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199509230954.LAA20269@grumble.grondar.za> (message from Mark Murray on Sat, 23 Sep 1995 11:54:43 +0200)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/games/x11/xneko xneko.c
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-commit@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * >   Modified:    games/x11/xneko  xneko.c

 * Just out of interest: What are X programs doing in the FreeBSD distribution?
 * should they not be in ports?

Apparently (according to the cvs logs), they came with the 4.4-Lite
tape.  But I agree with you, it doesn't make much sense to have these
in the main source tree when we don't have X in there! ;)

And if you just want a cute demo...well, xneko maybe, but xroach is
nothing short of "disgusting". :<

I propose to move them to ports.

Satoshi