From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Apr 16 18:50:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDE037B419 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3H1o2e05629; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:50:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200204170150.g3H1o2e05629@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Alexandr V. Shutko" Subject: Re: i386/37086: kernel trap 12 Reply-To: "Alexandr V. Shutko" Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR i386/37086; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Alexandr V. Shutko" To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, AVShutko@mail.khstu.ru Cc: Subject: Re: i386/37086: kernel trap 12 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:40:42 +1100 Hiten Pandya wrote: > Hmm, this reminds me, maybe it could be that the load is enough to overclock > the interrupts. Have you tried to use the DEVICE_POLLING code with your > 'fxp' drivers. The Polling code is stable enough to work, and trust me it > is pretty good, although this is just a suggestion, no guarantees. > Maybe the wx0 interface needs a perf. check, but I am working on adding > DEVICE_POLLING support for the various network cards, which should be able > to deal with pretty high loads. > If you don't mind, could you please send a bug-followup to this PR, and ask > if some committer can change its state to 'suspended'. I am currently not > a committer, otherwise I would have done it myself before bothering you. :) Please, somebody, change state of this pr to 'suspended'... -- With respect, Alexandr V. Shutko mailto:AVShutko@mail.khstu.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message