From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 7 15:47:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45AD237B401 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 15:47:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web13402.mail.yahoo.com (web13402.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFC5443FB1 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 15:47:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from giffunip@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030807224736.91742.qmail@web13402.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.91.194.107] by web13402.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 23:47:36 BST Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 23:47:36 +0100 (BST) From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Pedro=20F.=20Giffuni?=" To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20030807205558.GB76279@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Is umfpack really broken?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 22:47:37 -0000 --- Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:19:47PM +0100, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > > Hi; > > >From the log umfpack appears to be broken by a bug in ATLAS, but it was > > labelled: "BROKEN: Does not install" > > Perhaps it is now also broken by the ATLAS upgrade ;-) > OK ..that means I have to fix it :). > > Build logs are available on http://bento.freebsd.org. > > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-4-full/umfpack-4.1.log > Hmm.. ok, I looked at the current build and not on this one. thanks, Pedro. ________________________________________________________________________ Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/