From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 03:22:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A1D16A4CE; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 03:22:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from server1.astraldream.net (astraldream.net [69.20.5.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA83643D1D; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 03:22:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (63-170-138-118.cst-sg.blacksburg.ntc-com.net [63.170.138.118]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by server1.astraldream.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iBB3McQ06187 verified NO); Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:22:45 -0500 From: Suleiman Souhlal To: Michal Mertl In-Reply-To: <41B714DA.6090505@traveller.cz> References: <41B714DA.6090505@traveller.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1102735360.5281.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:22:41 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org cc: Andre Oppermann Subject: Re: New ICMP limits X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 03:22:56 -0000 Hi, On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 09:51, Michal Mertl wrote: > What do you think? Wouldn't it be better to move all the calls to badport_bandlim() to inside icmp_error()? Bye -- Suleiman Souhlal | ssouhlal@vt.edu The FreeBSD Project | ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org