From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 12 19:15:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA19557 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 19:15:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from shell6.ba.best.com (jkb@shell6.ba.best.com [206.184.139.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA19540 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 19:15:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkb@best.com) Received: from localhost (jkb@localhost) by shell6.ba.best.com (8.8.8/8.8.BEST) with SMTP id TAA22581; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 19:15:18 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: shell6.ba.best.com: jkb owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 19:15:18 -0800 (PST) From: Jan Koum X-Sender: jkb@shell6.ba.best.com To: Shawn Ramsey cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ethernet compatibility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk fxp0 rev 2 int a irq 12 on pci0:10 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:a0:c9:86:67:73 As long as the card is 10/100B (yes, that B is important from what I understand), you should have no problem with it at all. Are there better 10/100 cards? Probably. Should you bother looking for them if you are getting good deal on Intel cards? Probably not. -- Yan On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Shawn Ramsey wrote: >Is the Intel EtherExpress PRO 10/100 compatible with FreeBSD? I looked at >the compatibilty list, and that card wasnt speciifically listed. How >stable and or fast is this card? Is there a better 10/100 card I should >consider? (I am getting a great price on these cards) > >Thanks. > > > >