From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Sep 25 10:32:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA00699 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 10:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from word.smith.net.au (word.smith.net.au [202.0.75.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA00694 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 10:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost.smith.net.au [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA04904; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 03:00:29 +0930 (CST) Message-Id: <199709251730.DAA04904@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: S ren Schmidt cc: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith), hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATAPI Zip challenge : aftermath In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 25 Sep 1997 19:29:25 +0200." <199709251729.TAA24502@sos.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 03:00:26 +0930 From: Mike Smith Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id KAA00695 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > The replacement arrived today, and it exhibits the same basic > > behaviour; ie. it no longer looks like an IDE disk at all. It _does_ > > respond to the ATAPI probe, however they appear to have removed the IDE > > emulation in current models. > > Does it behave like an ATAPI device ?? Or is it some kind of proprietary > protocol ?? It appears to behave like an ATAPI device. Jason Thorpe's anectdotal evidence suggests that Iomega are rampant ATAPI/SCSI fans. > > It'd still be good if someone were to come forward and offer to add the > > necessary ATAPI support, of course. 8) > > Shouldn't be too difficult, IF it follows the ATAPI protocol... Indeed. mike