From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 9 10:54:25 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA18655 for current-outgoing; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 10:54:25 -0800 Received: from clinet.fi (root@clinet.fi [193.64.6.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA18646 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 10:54:22 -0800 Received: from katiska.clinet.fi (root@katiska.clinet.fi [193.64.6.3]) by clinet.fi (8.6.10/8.6.4) with ESMTP id UAA15265 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 20:50:53 +0200 From: Heikki Suonsivu Received: (root@localhost) by katiska.clinet.fi (8.6.10/8.6.4) id UAA02473; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 20:50:53 +0200 Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 20:50:53 +0200 Message-Id: <199503091850.UAA02473@katiska.clinet.fi> To: freebsd-current@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: nfs mounts backgrounded? Reply-To: Heikki Suonsivu Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Otaniemi, Finland Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk -current now backgrounds NFS mounts in /etc/rc? This breaks up things when local is mounted over NFS and local additions /etc/rc.local try to start up programs from local (which isn't mounted yet)? Are there any problems with not backgrounding the mount? -- Heikki Suonsivu, T{ysikuu 10 C 83/02210 Espoo/FINLAND, hsu@cs.hut.fi home +358-0-8031121 work -4513377 fax -4555276 riippu SN