From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 20 02:14:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548FB16A420 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 02:14:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ray.mihm@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA77D43D45 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 02:14:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ray.mihm@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t16so690083wxc for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 18:14:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=M28YlQW/j589k7zJdPJA3ujq3PwIyS8ekD7ZTAKDXlUOcN6vLydFOir2P5F0oM7HOOeG65rDeSIfnIoyV4kt4krxE9C53nzDm3kIU12XIIsO2gLmV2pnnJkDy3tsxuaNV9ul/s/z/i/w9NQ0bNEvCRtlTJplNtkdS9rnoi6Vd60= Received: by 10.70.20.19 with SMTP id 19mr1619967wxt; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 18:14:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.46.9 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 18:14:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1aa142960603191814x3f2c5ee2s8868d939ccc0fc05@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 18:14:23 -0800 From: "Ray Mihm" To: "Julian Elischer" In-Reply-To: <441E0415.2040908@elischer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <441E0415.2040908@elischer.org> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multiple routing tables X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 02:14:24 -0000 Marco's Zec's work IHMO is pretty good to be ignored. It can be adopted to 6.x pretty easily. I think having this in the base system along with jails makes it even more sweater and makes us a step ahead of zones (as in OpenSolaris). I understand it's an overkill for your requirements, but it's the right thing to do. Ray. On 3/19/06, Julian Elischer wrote: > I'm looking at a problem where I want onemachine to really look like 2. > this means I want to have 2 separate routing tables if possible. > > I know I could do it with eas if I could user Marco Zec's vimage patches > but I need to have a path forward to 6.x and beyond > > An answer would be to re-implement vimage for newer versions of FreeBSD b= ut > it's a bit of overkill and I was wondering if anyone had done anything > in this direction? > > Basically just allowing a jail to specify a different routing table > would be enough.... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >