From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 30 5:27:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from adelphi.physics.adelaide.edu.au (adelphi.physics.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.36.247]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9B11536A for ; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 05:27:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au) Received: from bragg (bragg [129.127.36.34]) by adelphi.physics.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.8/8.8.8/UofA-1.5) with SMTP id WAA12403; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 22:57:32 +0930 (CST) Received: from localhost by bragg; (5.65/1.1.8.2/05Aug95-0227PM) id AA06949; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 22:57:25 +0930 Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 22:57:25 +0930 (CST) From: Kris Kennaway X-Sender: kkennawa@bragg To: Steve Price Cc: Nate Williams , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports question In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Perhaps __FreeBSD_version should be bumped, if this is a choke point. > March 24 wasn't too long ago, it's probably not too late. Hrm, I didn't realise how long ago this mail was sent (4 days), and it seems the question has been well and truly resolved by now. That'll teach me to let mail build up in my folder :) Kris ----- The Feynman problem-solving algorithm: 1. Write down the problem 2. Think real hard 3. Write down the solution To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message