Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:56:14 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Lawrence Stewart <lstewart@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kthread_exit(9) unexpectedness Message-ID: <492677AE.7060607@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <4925E30B.8010709@freebsd.org> References: <492412E8.3060700@freebsd.org> <200811201502.23943.jhb@freebsd.org> <4925E30B.8010709@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lawrence Stewart wrote: > > I agree that the arrangement needs to be better documented. The change > in 8.x is subtle enough that reading the kthread man page in 7.x and 8.x > doesn't immediately make it obvious what's going on. > I tried to walk the fine line between being completely incompatible and letting people fall into a trap. The arguments and prototypes are different so code should fail to compile unless people have made changes to their code..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?492677AE.7060607>