From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 14 11:20:46 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1207E16A4CE
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 May 2004 11:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8775643D2D
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 May 2004 11:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-isp@m.gmane.org)
Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BOhIY-0003KC-00
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 May 2004 20:20:44 +0200
Received: from 86.red-213-97-212.pooles.rima-tde.net ([213.97.212.86])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 May 2004 20:20:42 +0200
Received: from lists-gmane by 86.red-213-97-212.pooles.rima-tde.net with local
	(Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 May 2004 20:20:42 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
From: Joan Picanyol i Puig <lists-gmane@biaix.org>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 17:02:46 +0200
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <pan.2004.05.14.15.02.45.452793@biaix.org>
References: <1886.213.112.193.11.1084410012.squirrel@mail.hackunite.net>
	<3063.151.31.34.32.1084484911.squirrel@mail.redix.it>
	<20040514103447.GA5131@grummit.biaix.org>
	<024501c439a6$e348f420$fbb4a741@cedata.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.red-213-97-212.pooles.rima-tde.net
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam..
X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Services Providers <freebsd-isp.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-isp>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 18:20:46 -0000

On Fri, 14 May 2004 08:30:30 -0400, Cirelle Enterprises wrote:

> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Joan Picanyol" <lists-freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
> To: <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 6:34 AM
> Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam..
> 
> 
> | * roberto@redix.it <roberto@redix.it> [20040513 23:48]:
> | >  2) use Sender Policy Framework (see http://spf.pobox.com);
> | 
> | http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/smtp-spf-is-harmful.html
> | 
> 
> Actually, SPF is not a spam tool. It was designed
> to protect against the Joe Job and only if everyone adopts it.

If you are willing to adopt this, you might as well wish to try to
implement im2000:

http://cr.yp.to/im2000.html
http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/Proposals/IM2000/

specifically, to remain OT,
http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/Proposals/IM2000/anti-ubm.html

qvb
-- 
pica