Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 06:33:09 -0500 From: Duane Hill <duihi77@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port version problem Message-ID: <251297043.20140323063309@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <532EC253.1020909@gmx.de> References: <20140323070513.537fcee0@scorpio> <532EC253.1020909@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, March 23, 2014, 6:15:31 AM, olli wrote: > On 2014-03-23 12:05, Jerry wrote: >> When I ran the following command after updating my port's tree: >> >> /usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL= >> >> It produced the following output: >> >> dri-9.1.7_3,2 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1_3,2) >> libEGL-9.1.7 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1) >> libGL-9.1.7 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1_4) >> libdrm-2.4.50 > succeeds index (index has 2.4.17_1) >> xf86-video-ati-7.2.0_1 > succeeds index (index has 6.14.6_1) >> xf86-video-intel-2.21.15_1 > succeeds index (index has 2.7.1_6) >> xorg-server-1.12.4_4,1 > succeeds index (index has 1.7.7_11,1) >> >> How is that even possible? I don't recall seeing anything in UPDATING that >> referred to this. >> > The param -I checks against /usr/ports/INDEX(-n) to speed up comparing. > Do you use portsnap or cvs to update the ports tree? > portsnap should automatically update the INDEX file unless the > setting in /etc/portsnap.conf was changed. > In case subversion is used, the INDEX is only updated with the following command $>> make fetchindex -C /usr/ports Or rebuild indexes from the ports directory: # cd /usr/ports && make index -- Duane Hill duihi77@gmail.com "If at first you don't succeed, so much for sky diving."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?251297043.20140323063309>