From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 22 10:18:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C4216A4CE for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sv02.webonaut.com (kirk.webonaut.com [212.41.243.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051A243D48 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:18:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from klammer@webonaut.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sv02.webonaut.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB65376423; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:18:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sv02.webonaut.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sv02.webonaut.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16985-07; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:18:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webonaut.com (sisko.webonaut.com [212.41.243.28]) by sv02.webonaut.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D1276421; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:18:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4087FE65.8050909@webonaut.com> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:18:29 +0200 From: Franz Klammer User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040408) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Marcus Clarke References: <4087AE92.1000506@webonaut.com> <1082649419.836.0.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <1082649419.836.0.camel@gyros> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at webonaut.com cc: gnome Subject: Re: multible port update question X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:18:28 -0000 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 07:37, Franz Klammer wrote: > > >>it's my first time i did it and therefore i will ask before sending a PR: >>how must a patch look like to update multiple ports in different categories? >>is the diff blow correct? >> >> > >I prefer that the patch is relative to the ports directory. That way, I >can cd to my checkout ports, and just do a patch -p < file, and it does >the right thing. Of course, making it relative from /usr isn't bad, >either. > > > made a new patch relative to the ports directory: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=65894 hope it's basically ok. but I've found some mistakes in my diff after sending the PR :-( sending a follow up soon... franz. >Joe > > > >>http://webonaut.com/temp/psi-update-all.diff >> >>franz. >> >>