From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 30 00:23:21 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB6D16A403;
	Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:23:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org)
From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:23:16 +0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <20061127222709.aa35ab22.nork@FreeBSD.org>
	<44irgyjlyf.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <200611291052.23327@aldan>
In-Reply-To: <200611291052.23327@aldan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="koi8-u"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200611300823.17106.davidxu@freebsd.org>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org>,
	Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org>,
	Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>
Subject: Re: ports/devel/icu: PTHREAD_LIBS clean
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:23:22 -0000

On Wednesday 29 November 2006 23:52, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
<snip>
> Since nothing is using ICU in a multi-threaded fashion _right now_, the
> current version of the port builds without threads by default. Norikatsu
> confirms, he is not calling into ICU from multiple threads either, hence my
> suggestion, he does not need to change the option.
>
> When the ia64's thread-implementation improves, the next update to the port
> will change the default...
>
> 	-mi

I don't have ia64 machine, the machine in cluster is inconvenient for me to do
such a hard work. so I don't know when thread library implementation will be 
fixed, it is totally out of my control. :-)

David Xu