Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 08:43:22 -0400 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> To: bkhl@elektrubadur.se (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Lindstr=F6m?=) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NAT trouble Message-ID: <20040719084322.04d29496.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <s38ekn9xhus.fsf@numerus.ling.uu.se> References: <s38smbpxrov.fsf@numerus.ling.uu.se> <20040718124432.56a7b923.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <s38ekn9xhus.fsf@numerus.ling.uu.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
bkhl@elektrubadur.se (Bj=F6rn Lindstr=F6m) wrote:
> Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> writes:
>=20
> >> (Where tun0 is the interface of my ADSL connection.)
> >
> > Is tun0 the real interface?
>=20
> No, the actual card is rl0:
>=20
> rl0: flags=3D8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet6 fe80::2e0:4cff:feb0:5d5b%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1=20
> ether 00:e0:4c:b0:5d:5b
> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
> status: active
> ppp0: flags=3D8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> tun0: flags=3D8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1492
> inet 81.228.156.82 --> 81.228.156.1 netmask 0xffffffff=20
> Opened by PID 53
>=20
> Is it the actual NIC that should be put in $nat_interface?
No, you should use the tun0 as you have ... I was just checking. Perhaps
natd isn't starting becuase the tun0 interface does not yet exist when
it tries to start?
> > What happens if you start it manually?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
?
--=20
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040719084322.04d29496.wmoran>