From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 25 04:04:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA29259 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 04:04:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from aaka.3skel.com (aaka.3skel.com [207.240.212.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA29086 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 04:04:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danj@3skel.com) Received: from fnur.3skel.com (fnur.3skel.com [192.168.0.8]) by aaka.3skel.com (8.8.5/8.8.2) with ESMTP id HAA10812; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 07:03:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (danj@localhost) by fnur.3skel.com (8.8.5/8.8.2) with SMTP id HAA18716; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 07:03:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 07:03:46 -0500 (EST) From: Dan Janowski To: Terry Lambert cc: Tom , jak@cetlink.net, grog@lemis.com, cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us, AdamT@smginc.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, rob@f-body.org Subject: Re: Token Ring for FreeBSD yet? In-Reply-To: <199802250623.XAA10871@usr05.primenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Terry Lambert wrote: > It also allows for bidirectional, if you do it right (like FDDI does). Someone said, before, the kernel would need stuff in it to merely deal with the token-passing architecture. After that, network drivers could be written. Don't we already have FDDI? Does it provide a similar token-passing substructure? Dan -- danj@3skel.com Dan Janowski Triskelion Systems, Inc. Bronx, NY To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message