From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 28 18:44:04 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189F916A4CE
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:44:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4AB43D1D
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:44:03 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 2F515148ED; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:44:01 -0600 (CST)
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:44:01 -0600 (CST)
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho
To: Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20050128173327.GI61409@myrddin.originative.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0501281239110.17061-100000@pancho>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: c99/c++ localised variable definition
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:44:04 -0000

On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Paul Richards wrote:

> This is likely to he highly controversial, since generally change
> tends to be in this project.

In my experience this usually depends on exactly how the changes
are proposed, the track record of the proposer, and whether patches
are supplied.

mcl