Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 11:14:02 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> Cc: audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PATH_MAX vs MAXPATHLEN Message-ID: <200103021814.f22IE3d58463@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 02 Mar 2001 11:51:06 CST." <20010302115105.A63024@hamlet.nectar.com> References: <20010302115105.A63024@hamlet.nectar.com> <200103020206.f2226Md53114@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010302115105.A63024@hamlet.nectar.com> "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: : I think (strlen(path) > PATH_MAX) is now an off-by-one error, : considering the thread of yesterday. It is definately so in : some of the code you included (e.g. `char p_path[PATH_MAX]'). It was an off by one error yesterday too :-). : These are probably just the result of doing s/MAXPATHLEN + 1/PATH_MAX/ : in definitions, but s/MAXPATHLEN/PATH_MAX/ in comparisons. But I didn't do anything like that... BTW, which code fragment are we talking about? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103021814.f22IE3d58463>