From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 17 18:33:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 096CA16A417; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:33:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9681316A412 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:33:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3220B13C441 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:32:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0HHumWd042460; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:57:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: Alexander Leidinger Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:56:41 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200701162346.l0GNkSOi063600@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070117100753.s34xp2kc1wks40w4@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20070117100753.s34xp2kc1wks40w4@webmail.leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701171256.45889.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2459/Tue Jan 16 17:03:34 2007 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 113033 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:33:01 -0000 On Wednesday 17 January 2007 04:07 am, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Jung-uk Kim (from Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:46:28 GMT): > > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=113033 > > > > Change 113033 by jkim@jkim_hammer on 2007/01/16 23:45:49 > > > > MFi386: iopl(2) > > > > This fixes LTP iopl01 and iopl02 on amd64. > > Is the thread stuff MD? If not, is there something else which is > MD? This is not thread stuff. ;-) It is MD because i386 has eflags while amd64 has rflags, which is 64-bit extended eflags. Jung-uk Kim