From owner-cvs-sys  Sun Nov  5 10:47:34 1995
Return-Path: owner-cvs-sys
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id KAA08924
          for cvs-sys-outgoing; Sun, 5 Nov 1995 10:47:34 -0800
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA08917
          ; Sun, 5 Nov 1995 10:47:28 -0800
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id FAA11281; Mon, 6 Nov 1995 05:45:08 +1100
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 1995 05:45:08 +1100
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199511051845.FAA11281@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: j@uriah.heep.sax.de, peter@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys conf.h
Cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-cvs-sys@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>There's yet another conflicting definition around: struct pmap is
>defined twice in a totally different context.  Inside the kernel (and
>...
>I've attempted to work around this by introducing a `pmap_t' as an
>alias for the kernel `struct pmap', but while this made lint happy, it
>caused me grief with libkvm -- this turned out to be the reason for my
>question about ``proc size mismatch'' for programs like ps(1) etc.

There's already a pmap_t (typedef struct pmap *pmap_t).  I dislike
using typedefs for structs and pointers.

Bruce