From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 3 22:39:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from wrath.cs.utah.edu (wrath.cs.utah.edu [155.99.198.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6E837B405 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 22:39:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from famine.cs.utah.edu (famine.cs.utah.edu [155.99.198.114]) by wrath.cs.utah.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g346cMb24306; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 23:38:23 -0700 (MST) Received: by famine.cs.utah.edu (Postfix, from userid 2373) id 94D3223ACF; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 23:38:21 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by famine.cs.utah.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE82279D6; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 23:38:21 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 23:38:21 -0700 (MST) From: John Regehr To: Julian Elischer Cc: Mike Silbersack , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linuxthreads on Linux vs FreeBSD performance question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Have you tried benchmarking process to process context switch times to see > > if the results are similar? No, that's a good idea. My infrastructure isn't set up to support processes, though, so it'll take a little time. > Also: > You should run both linuxthreads binaries compile on linux (using > emulation) and compiled on FreeBSD. it would be interesting to see > if there is a difference.. There does not appear to be a statistically significant difference between a native binary and an emulated Linux binary. Thanks, John Regehr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message