From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun  1 14:20:06 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701AC106566B;
	Tue,  1 Jun 2010 14:20:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from james-freebsd-current@jrv.org)
Received: from zimbra.jrv.org (rrcs-24-73-246-106.sw.biz.rr.com
	[24.73.246.106])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D2F8FC1E;
	Tue,  1 Jun 2010 14:20:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zimbra.jrv.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EC216A055;
	Tue,  1 Jun 2010 09:20:05 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.housenet.jrv
Received: from zimbra.jrv.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (zimbra.housenet.jrv [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id K4mALA7efzOL; Tue,  1 Jun 2010 09:20:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [10.0.2.15] (adsl-70-243-84-14.dsl.austtx.swbell.net
	[70.243.84.14])
	by zimbra.jrv.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E1E316A053;
	Tue,  1 Jun 2010 09:20:04 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4C051732.3070208@jrv.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:20:34 -0500
From: "James R. Van Artsdalen" <james-freebsd-current@jrv.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
References: <20100529130240.GA99732@freebsd.org>
	<20100530135859.GI83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<508DA8CE-749A-46B4-AF0B-392DB08CBBCD@samsco.org>
	<4C04456D.7080408@jrv.org> <4C04587E.70800@freebsd.org>
	<20100601083809.GF83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20100601083809.GF83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Lawrence Stewart <lstewart@freebsd.org>,
	Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to
 HEAD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:20:06 -0000

On 6/1/2010 3:38 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> This is unsufficient. What could work is if clang provided some common
> symbol into all .o files generated by it, e.g. __clang_compiled. And
> then kernel considered tainted with corresponding banner printed when
> weak reference to that symbol is resolved to non-zero. This does not
> handle modules and does not cleanly handle usermode runtime (libc,
> libthr, rtld etc).
>   

Would it be sufficient if send-pr were modified to test the kernel, all
loaded modules, and shared objects in /lib, /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib,
and to list all items that were _not_ marked with the default compiler &
version?