Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:05:44 +0100 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: gahr@FreeBSD.org Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r308132 - head/audio/amrcoder Message-ID: <50BC8788.3090405@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20121203105616.GA86596@gahrfit.gahr.ch> References: <201212031034.qB3AYpkL004754@svn.freebsd.org> <20121203105040.GA30670@FreeBSD.org> <20121203105616.GA86596@gahrfit.gahr.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Pietro Cerutti ha scritto: > I see no reason, however, not to let the author supersede them with > more appropriate flags. If they were appropriate, why have you changed them? :-) This is the exact reason why we want the user set these optimization flags. When there is a really good motivation to add higher optimization flags usually we have OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS OPTION. - -- Alex Dupre -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlC8h4gACgkQgRXp2M5fVU2IfwCgy9GwAWZ15vxSlmmTnJW2rBIe vm4AoP+hOyKxR3jEhR8pGwiPkzmzlIaZ =nZfA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50BC8788.3090405>