From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 23 11:39:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40A4536D for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x236.google.com (mail-qc0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB84FE42 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:39:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id e16so4656598qcx.41 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:39:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FcBbkEEnkL/Ty7/VtQ+crcxDi6ZpOdpJA1VfAT/a+z4=; b=bdvLMJTeGhB5/AvmxMXqO4zHwE2cF8gy23nNSv0dJypOfNT34ZXEf2Q8Je8ViI9Jsu ClQt5aJDkmVrRR3ZJyZqkUiByO2N6EQ5A/j1WaMjsMgCWAAM7B2D/ZO2qzg/TEQ/VEG/ uQWdh9vlNWBpc/OYxAJdtILIgxlpoGhs406lE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FcBbkEEnkL/Ty7/VtQ+crcxDi6ZpOdpJA1VfAT/a+z4=; b=WZB6OcGQg7KnKfd37rJ4lkS9sxNjmZ/bQ3iRl4OjYUCY/Vit1ujGpreh/wgd6MxN7z AGU4yQWXLxLX4tkjF/pId8yBZILsR7LpjPDvODM04GBeLwm2pz4qQSBWK487UU87Z5Qq XKgbUTNgO1jvG1EIqJpE3PHfV79fkoSHH5SiInNIVInfWlmvhqcSkGilqGk3Avor8fmr pMPZnZFWzRy61YtStqVbcCJy/JJDB6VDq6ObFYap2J/yoUegdvaGDVmcnpzuknr7hUzy +/nPMaAaHnS8LSc/zyr4GQd22A86QcJMfrAXu8LOXbhcqFU9L9U0qzonswCI2aDAIeCV DmGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl2e5xoIamHW2JdyxlbRR5ZkjItUwLZoKNx2NWiVSJtLTP5wYki1Z4hnnQ7SDLpctMO4olA X-Received: by 10.224.66.74 with SMTP id m10mr68738715qai.14.1395574761190; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 104sm6801211qgq.1.2014.03.23.04.39.20 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:39:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:39:20 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Port version problem Message-ID: <20140323073920.346d8f9e@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <532EC253.1020909@gmx.de> References: <20140323070513.537fcee0@scorpio> <532EC253.1020909@gmx.de> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Ports List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:39:22 -0000 On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:15:31 +0100, olli hauer stated: /usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL= > On 2014-03-23 12:05, Jerry wrote: > > When I ran the following command after updating my port's tree: > > > > /usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL= > > > > It produced the following output: > > > > dri-9.1.7_3,2 > succeeds index (index has > > 7.6.1_3,2) libEGL-9.1.7 > succeeds index (index > > has 7.6.1) libGL-9.1.7 > succeeds index (index > > has 7.6.1_4) libdrm-2.4.50 > succeeds index > > (index has 2.4.17_1) xf86-video-ati-7.2.0_1 > succeeds > > index (index has 6.14.6_1) xf86-video-intel-2.21.15_1 > > > succeeds index (index has 2.7.1_6) xorg-server-1.12.4_4,1 > > > succeeds index (index has 1.7.7_11,1) > > > > How is that even possible? I don't recall seeing anything in UPDATING > > that referred to this. > > > > > The param -I checks against /usr/ports/INDEX(-n) to speed up comparing. > > Do you use portsnap or cvs to update the ports tree? > > portsnap should automatically update the INDEX file unless the setting > in /etc/portsnap.conf was changed. > > In case subversion is used, the INDEX is only updated with the following > command $> make fetchindex -C /usr/ports I ran the following commands in this order: /usr/sbin/portsnap fetch update /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -u /usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL= I just reran those command and it produced the exact same results. -- Jerry