Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:43:11 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.bawue.com> To: rotkap@gmx.de Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whats this: UPDATING 2007030 Message-ID: <20070308084311.GC27709@voodoo.bawue.com> In-Reply-To: <hrm4c4-v7f1.ln1@news.hansenet.de> References: <2lm2c4-1h1.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <45EF0778.9080400@FreeBSD.org> <20070307210236.GA27709@voodoo.bawue.com> <hrm4c4-v7f1.ln1@news.hansenet.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:25:21AM +0100, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.bawue.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:42:00PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > >> Heino Tiedemann wrote: > >> > > >> > sorry I do not understand, WHAT to do there. > >> > > >> > Okay, there is an example, but what doas this mean concretely to me? > >> > > >> > Does that mean, that I am responsible fu"r all deps in ports? > >> > That cannot be? is it? > >> > > >> > >> I think you can just ignore it if you don't understand. It's safe in the > >> case. Do not run pkgdb -L. Dependencies will restore after a few upgrades. > > > > Hmm, it seems portupgrade-devel is broken eg: > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > The entry in UPDATING was about portupgrade-devel? Not portupgrade > "normal" AFFECTS: users of ports-mgmt/portupgrade* Note the star. -Kirill
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070308084311.GC27709>