From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug  3 16:39:28 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FAA088A
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun,  3 Aug 2014 16:39:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 176B723DB
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun,  3 Aug 2014 16:39:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s73GdRs6078487
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 16:39:27 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 192344] [stage][PATCH] mail/milter-manager: STAGEify and
 various updates
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 16:39:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: fullermd@over-yonder.net
X-Bugzilla-Status: Patch Ready
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-192344-13-1d1fhBD0HR@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-192344-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-192344-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 16:39:28 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192344

--- Comment #7 from fullermd@over-yonder.net ---
Well, if consensus is to keep micromanaging them, I can go through it.

I don't feel like the difference adds much value though.  It's pretty much
meaningless to users, and the main advantage to devs/maintainers is to be able
to hint "Hey, dummy, you forgot something in the plist that it's installing". 
But post-stage, the plist defines the installing, so that shouldn't happen
anyway.  And since the closer you get to makeplist's output, the easier future
updates get to handle and check, that seems like the better set of tradeoffs.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.