From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 31 08:14:41 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA29C9E78 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 08:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond.endrestol@ximalas.info) Received: from enterprise.ximalas.info (enterprise.ximalas.info [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1::8]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "ximalas.info", Issuer "Hostmaster ximalas.info" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46L8Jw4q8Zz4DZX for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 08:14:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond.endrestol@ximalas.info) Received: from enterprise.ximalas.info (Ximalas@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by enterprise.ximalas.info (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7V8EYZH019561 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:14:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond.endrestol@ximalas.info) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ximalas.info; s=default; t=1567239274; bh=AOPkAv2sB25lGTGRlBGaNaIhZw5KmnoIcAc6FZeubqE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=pY8m4S6cqaHQFvQPa2ruSr5EkQ6NgfaRyd7OdGgCxFADGkhXTE53TxRnPWQw2f/Zq CsE2WU6I9DKBxB12SW38xQ5vGXfxCxPX+Pz1Bf24NCX4qonn0iEtX+GHsK+icmX8G9 0SzcPvim77tkMO0DEXUi4Vy9wo5Gk+IuksvR9Yj65zHO/KdiyctNuI7CSoZGyRdi9E 7MXPPf3nNcn0DemxkqZHHTzNfqtvIT5V5XcumhSJeYz2Un9ZTOlQStTVzhY6NBoLS1 yq1bBc4c3Ene9zo30KulbsVxoJKIULJ6dSKajFOpCtIrEyZgKOmtZAj4bI9beRDF/h 46OzhjV5/I21Q== Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by enterprise.ximalas.info (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id x7V8EYNF019554 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:14:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond.endrestol@ximalas.info) X-Authentication-Warning: enterprise.ximalas.info: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:14:34 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Trond_Endrest=C3=B8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@ximalas.info To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ruby 2.4.7,1 considered vulnerable? In-Reply-To: <531cf12d-0038-ec72-f173-033d7b2d44ba@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <531cf12d-0038-ec72-f173-033d7b2d44ba@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.99999 (BSF 352 2019-06-22) OpenPGP: url=http://ximalas.info/about/tronds-openpgp-public-key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on enterprise.ximalas.info X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46L8Jw4q8Zz4DZX X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ximalas.info header.s=default header.b=pY8m4S6c; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=ximalas.info; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of trond.endrestol@ximalas.info designates 2001:700:1100:1::8 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=trond.endrestol@ximalas.info X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.51 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ximalas.info:s=default]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ximalas.info:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[ximalas.info,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.987,0]; IP_SCORE(-1.53)[ip: (-6.66), ipnet: 2001:700::/32(-0.56), asn: 224(-0.40), country: NO(-0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:224, ipnet:2001:700::/32, country:NO]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 08:14:41 -0000 On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 17:43+1000, MJ wrote: > Given the liberal use of portepoch in the package versions I expect > the maintainer has got confused. Indeed perhaps it's the portepoch > that's causing the issue. Perhaps contact the maintainer to get it > worked through? I just created PR 240227: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240227 -- Trond.