From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sat Nov 3 14:44:51 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECD310FFB90; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 14:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 325C38513F; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 14:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13792B5451B; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 10:44:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from anthias (vie-188-118-241-150.dsl.sil.at [188.118.241.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37114B542B0; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 10:44:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 15:44:47 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Pedro Giffuni , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r483896 - head/lang/cilkplus In-Reply-To: <201811031422.wA3EM46d096516@repo.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201811031422.wA3EM46d096516@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2018 14:44:51 -0000 On Sat, 3 Nov 2018, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Author: gerald > Date: Sat Nov 3 14:22:04 2018 > New Revision: 483896 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/483896 > > Log: > GCC 8 removed CilkPlus support, so we cannot USE_GCC=yes. Instead > force the use of GCC 7, the last version with CilPlus support. > > PR: 231590 Going beyond that, I'd recommend to deprecate this port for now and mark it for removal in a couple of months (two?) say. Okay? Gerald