From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 5 14:33:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 885) id EA86837B405; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:33:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:33:39 -0700 From: Eric Melville To: Andrey Simonenko Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of dialog(1) and libdialog. Message-ID: <20010705143339.A98165@FreeBSD.org> References: <01c201c10468$b6a71e40$6d36120a@comsys.ntukpi.kiev.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <01c201c10468$b6a71e40$6d36120a@comsys.ntukpi.kiev.ua>; from simon@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua on Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 01:07:12PM +0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I'm working on some patches for dialog(1) and libdialog. > Does FreeBSD team want to continue use of dialog(1) program > and libdialog in future? I ask this question because I fix > some problems I have with dialog(1) (really with libdialog) and > I'm going to try to fix the same problems with all functions in > libdialog, so I want to know if it will be interesting for FreeBSD. > I saw some bug reports for dialog/libdialog, but didn't see "good" > reactions on that PRs. I'm currently working on libdialog, hopefully making the interface a bit more sensible. I'd like to see what you're up too, hopefully we're not duplicating efforts. Currently the plan is to commit this stuff in a day or two. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message