From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Jul 20 11:09:27 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA00700 for chat-outgoing; Sat, 20 Jul 1996 11:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yucca.cs.odu.edu (root@yucca.cs.odu.edu [128.82.4.6]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA00691 for ; Sat, 20 Jul 1996 11:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zaxxon.cs.odu.edu (bowden@zaxxon.cs.odu.edu [128.82.4.91]) by yucca.cs.odu.edu (8.7.3/8.6.4) with SMTP id OAA21861; Sat, 20 Jul 1996 14:09:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 14:08:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Jamie Bowden To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Amancio Hasty , Marty Leisner , Craig Shaver , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Opinions? NT VS UNIX, NT SUCKS SOMETIMES In-Reply-To: <199607200515.WAB20513@MindBender.HeadCandy.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 19 Jul 1996, Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com wrote: > We were talking about server OS's. We were talking about Windows NT. > We were not discussing home gaming platforms. Windows 95 is not > Windows NT. But don't worry, it will be. If you even try to convince me M$ isn't going to get to one os to have to devel./support/market, I am gonna have to get rude. I installed a 4.0 NT beta realease (build 13 something or other). If M$ wasn't going to fade out win95, why require all win95 approved binaries be NT compatible as well? NT is not a bad OS, it's not my prefered OS. It reminds me of NeXT in serious way : better hope your GUI doesn't ever get screwed, cause if it does, so do you. Jamie I have my finger on the pulse of the planet.