Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 14:08:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Jamie Bowden <bowden@cs.odu.edu> To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>, Marty Leisner <leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com>, Craig Shaver <craig@progroup.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Opinions? NT VS UNIX, NT SUCKS SOMETIMES Message-ID: <Pine.3.91.960720140400.642B-100000@zaxxon.cs.odu.edu> In-Reply-To: <199607200515.WAB20513@MindBender.HeadCandy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 19 Jul 1996, Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com wrote: > We were talking about server OS's. We were talking about Windows NT. > We were not discussing home gaming platforms. Windows 95 is not > Windows NT. But don't worry, it will be. If you even try to convince me M$ isn't going to get to one os to have to devel./support/market, I am gonna have to get rude. I installed a 4.0 NT beta realease (build 13 something or other). If M$ wasn't going to fade out win95, why require all win95 approved binaries be NT compatible as well? NT is not a bad OS, it's not my prefered OS. It reminds me of NeXT in serious way : better hope your GUI doesn't ever get screwed, cause if it does, so do you. Jamie I have my finger on the pulse of the planet.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.3.91.960720140400.642B-100000>