From owner-freebsd-mobile Thu May 27 16:11:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2410014F63 for ; Thu, 27 May 1999 16:11:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA02744; Thu, 27 May 1999 16:08:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199905272308.QAA02744@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Brad Karp Cc: raj@cisco.com, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org, wpaul@ctr.columbia.edu Subject: Re: wi driver and WaveLAN IEEE 802.11 Turbo cards In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 27 May 1999 19:05:18 EDT." <199905272305.TAA10446@dominator.eecs.harvard.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 16:08:36 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Setting the network number with old WaveLAN cards wasn't really a form > of "security," of course, since a user could listen on successive network > IDs and easily determine which was in use. There was no encryption of any > kind, nor authentication. The old Wavelan cards also ignore the NWID in promiscuous mode. > There exist Lucent IEEE 802.11 WaveLAN "WEP" ("Wired-Equivalent Privacy") > cards, which are said to use 40-bit encryption on packets over the air. > I've neither seen nor used such a card, and haven't seen details of the > scheme. I would *guess* that the encryption is shared-secret symmetric, > and that each user must configure the card with the 40-bit key to use. > That is, I would guess that the system makes no attempt to deal with > key management. And the WavePoint-II, even with WEP, won't do anything to > authenticate a node (though the node will need the right 40-bit key to > communicate usefully, perhaps). The WEP mode is achieved by plugging in the "DES chip" on the older cards. All traffic is encrypted using a shared secret; you can only communicate with other cards that are using the same secret. > I've no idea if the WEP cards will encrypt in ad-hoc mode. I see no > fundamental technical reason why they couldn't, if my assumption about > no key management, under which each host has to configure the card with the key > individually, is correct. They were claimed to encrypt in ad-hoc mode, yes. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message